Direct continuation of Can the Death Star Really Destroy a Planet?
To recap, we learned last week in the first part of what will now be a three-part once-a-week series that it takes 3.737×1032 joules for the Death Star to destroy a planet. We also know from the previous article that this power is equivalent to:
- The energy in 249 sextillion lightning bolts.
- The energy released by 893 trillion combined atomic bombs.
- Enough energy to power the world for 471 times the current age of the universe.
- Equal to the sustained energy output of the sun for 11.2 days.
- 1,384 trillion times the energy output of a photon torpedo. (Using data from the TNG Technical Manual)
If you noticed the fourth bullet, you could be powering a similar device with sustained solar power in a Dyson Sphere type deal. Of course, beyond the feasibility of storing a sun as the core of a spaceship, the idea is still impractical for two reasons — one shot on a planet would deplete a little over 11 days of normal operation, and your doomship would have to be much larger than one would want.
The Death Star in the films and extended semi-canon novels was given to be between 120 and 160 kilometers which is 8,700 times smaller than the Sun. Additionally, the Death Star is not only powering a laser, but it also has to provide for “a crew of 265,675, as well as 52,276 gunners, 607,360 troops, 30,984 stormtroopers, 42,782 ship support staff, and 180,216 pilots and support crew.” Additionally, it has to power “10,000 turbolaser batteries, 2,600 ion cannons, and at least 768 tractor beam projectors.” Lastly, the first death Star was able to recoup the 3.737×1032J in a day, and the second Death Star was rumored to be hypothetically capable of recouping the energy in a mere three minutes. Solar energy is out.
While not ruling out “sufficiently advanced technology”, what things that are known about today could be powering the ship? What about the matter-antimatter thing you hear about from nearly every Star Trek episode where the warp drive goes haywire? In a matter-antimatter explosion, the energy output is equal to the famous equation E=mc2. So how much matter/antimatter would we need? We can solve for it.
E = mc2
3.737×1032 = m(9×1016)
m = (3.737×1032)/(9×1016)
m = 4,152,222,222,222,222kg
Even with total conversion of mass into energy — which is the most efficient source of energy known — a little more than four trillion metric tons of antimatter would be consumed in the production of one planet destroying beam charge. So how much space would that take up? It’s impossible to say without knowing the density of antimatter. However, you would also need a method of constantly replenishing the reaction; needing to be able to generate trillions of metric tons every day (or every three minutes).
Another idea involves a little mix with Stargate SG-1, and to have a network of mobile Stargates or wormholes to flow the energy into. This would reduce the space requirements, but you still would need enough wormhole volume to flow the energy through in a quick enough manner. With no space constraints, it would be feasible using advanced future tech to channel energy from a stellar body or group of stellar bodies that generate 5,376 suns of energy output — enough to fire a shot every three minutes.
So either the Sith crossed over to MGM, or they got their hands on some crazy power stuffs, or maybe they really are powering the whole thing with the Force.
I’m running out of ideas to power the massive energy needed to destroy a planet. There’s got to be a better way to destroy the entire planet, which we’ll explore next week. Or maybe the Sith could just get used to killing everyone on the surface of the planet.
I now blog at EverydayUtilitarian.com. I hope you'll join me at my new blog! This page has been left as an archive.