This post brought to you by http://www.greatplay.net by Peter Hurford.
Check out the homepage for games, projects, and more blog posts.

Ads, woo!

 

Can the Death Star Really Destroy a Planet?

As you may or may not know, a planet — like Earth or an unsuspecting Alderaan — is actually really hard to destroy. It’s really easy to kill all the life on the surface of the planet, or make it so the surface of the planet would be completely useless for billions of years, but it’s actually really hard to destroy the planet itself.

“Death Star” Table of Contents

Part I: Destroying the Planet
Part II: How to Power The Death Star
Part III: Easier Ways
Part IV: How to Move a Planet

 

The Sith

For the Sith, just killing everyone on the surface of the planet isn’t good enough. Darth Vader can probably do that with the Force in his sleep. The Sith need a weapon that will destroy any inhabited planet into a pile of space rubble, and preferably quickly. Unfortunately for them and the Death Star, planets have a large variety of physics that prevent them from being destroyed by just anyone’s galactic weapon of mass death.

Pictured: Not just anyone’s galactic weapon of mass death. Not pictured: Saturn’s Moon Mimas.

 

The first problem is that you can’t take shortcuts, like vaporizing the surface. This would make the planet uninhabitable and destroy all life, but the planet itself would just turn into a gas planet, held together by that stupid gravity we keep hearing about. Then, over millions of years, all the gas would cool and the planet could start all over again. There might even be a chance for life, which means a chance for intelligent life, which means a chance for future Jedis.

So we’re going to need to drill the laser into the planet and destroy the whole thing. This brings us to the problems with gravity again. Even if you were to build a giant laser capable of slicing a planet in half and then you used that aforementioned laser on an unsuspecting Alderaan, stupid Alderaan gravity would slam the planet back together again. Sure, the resulting force will obviously kill all life on the surface of the planet, but… you know… not good enough.

Ultimately, you’re going to have to use your laser to provide such a large force that all the resulting chunks are each fast enough to escape the gravity of the planet, or — in advanced words — have enough acceleration to achieve escape velocity. Seeing as we don’t have this data for Alderaan, we’re going to change our target to Earth.

More specifically, we’re aiming for Texas.

 

We’ve learned from Wikipedia Physics class that the escape velocity for Earth is 11.186 kilometers per second. Knowing that the magic equation KE = .5mv2, or kinetic energy (in joules) = .5(mass of object in kg)(velocity of object in meters/second)2, we can tell how much kinetic energy will be needed to accelerate the earth (or rather, all of its soon to be pieces) to it’s own escape velocity.

We just plug into the equation, and presto! We get that KE = .5(5.9736×1024)(11,186m/s)2, which equates to a kinetic energy of 3.737×1032 joules.

Even cooler now that you know it’s taking 3.737×1032J to do it.

 

Of course, it must be noted that as the surface of the planet is lasered apart, the lower parts will have less escape velocity (because the mass gets increasingly smaller), so the kinetic energy is a bit more than you’d actually need to destroy Earth. However, the explosion seen in the Star Wars movie also happened absurdly fast with a large amount of force, which indicates that each piece is being thrown apart with a lot more than just escape velocity.

Now, sadly, this doesn’t answer the problem of “Can the Death Star Really Destroy a Planet?” Of course, the answer is “yes”, as the Death Star is fictional, and it did destroy a planet. However, 3.737×1032J is a lot of energy. Imagine an area the size of Iraq (438,317km2). Fill that entire area with strings of lightbulbs as dense as possible. With that amount of energy, you could power all those lightbulbs for roughly 22 trillion years.

3.737×1032J is also:

  • The energy in 249 sextillion lightning bolts.
  • The energy released by 893 trillion combined atomic bombs.
  • Enough energy to power the world for 471 times the current age of the universe.
  • Equal to the sustained energy output of the sun for 11.2 days.
  • 1,384 trillion times the energy output of a photon torpedo. (Using data from the TNG Technical Manual)

Now imagine a 249 sextillion of these.

 

So you’re going to have to find some way to store that large amount of energy. Since it’s the future, we don’t need to get into the technicalities of just how to do that, but given that it’s the size of a planet itself, we can assume that a large amount of it is devoted to energy storage.

Next Page, Part II

But Wait! There's More!

10 Comments

  1. Jeff says:

    So how many nukes would it take to destroy a planet?

    Would it be more efficient to do it that way?

  2. Josh Maxwell says:

    Hi there,

    I looked over your blog and it looks really good. Do you ever do link exchanges on your blog roll? If you do, I’d like to exchange links with you.

    Let me know if you’re interested.

    Thanks..

  3. Morpheus says:

    Somehow, I feel a bit better now. That said, probably easier to push a planet into its sun….

  4. Peter says:

    @Jeff: Apparently it would take a little lower than 893 trillion combined atomic bombs to destroy a planet. That’s a very, very large nuclear arsenal, not to mention that it would have to be concentrated somehow. An energy beam seems easier.

    @Morpheus: Probably easier, yes. Somehow I think I’ll be reanalyzing this in the future.

    @Josh Maxwell: I’ll consider it and email you if I’m interested.

  5. I hear it only takes two Soviet nukes in order to destroy the world, the FREE world…

  6. Peter says:

    @Gregory Lee Johnson
    It’s really easy to “destroy” the world by killing everyone on the planet, but it’s really hard to destroy the world by breaking it into several chunks doomed to become an asteroid field.

    Fun fact: With the earth gone, the Moon will soon enter orbit around Earth, and depending on the size of the Earth chunks, it is very likely it will “clear it’s neighbourhood” and qualify to be a planet.

  7. @Peter
    Thank you condescending blogger! I read your article and see that.

  8. Hi, very nice post. I have been wonder’n bout this issue,so thanks for posting

  9. Keith says:

    Star Wars isn’t scientifically accurate? You don’t say! I must say that the explosions in the originals were better before George Lucas decided to tamper with them in the 1997 special editions (adding rings and such).

Leave a Reply